Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of Appeals

151 Conn. 732

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of Appeals. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Conn. 657 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 8, 1964·Published

Opinion

Upon reargument, the motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.

William C. Bieluch, for the appellees (plaintiffs). Robert Ewing, with whom was Russell L. Post, for the appellants (defendants Humble Oil and Eefining Company et al.). Joseph J. Burns, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellant (named defendant). Reargued January 7 decided January 8, 1964

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon reargument, the motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.

William C. Bieluch, for the appellees (plaintiffs). Robert Ewing, with whom was Russell L. Post, for the appellants (defendants Humble Oil and Eefining Company et al.). Joseph J. Burns, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellant (named defendant). Reargued January 7 decided January 8, 1964

Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 151 Conn. 732 (Colo. 1964).

Pincite

151 Conn. 732 (Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.