Krejci v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

607 N.E.2d 446, 66 Ohio St. 3d 15
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 1993·No. No. 92-465·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, has certified the following question to us:

“Does Ohio Revised Code § 3929.06 preclude an injured person from bringing any action, including a declaratory judgment action, against the tortfeasor’s insurer unless the injured person has first obtained a judgment against the insured?”

The certified question is answered in the negative.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krejci v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance, 607 N.E.2d 446, 66 Ohio St. 3d 15 (Ohio 1993).

607 N.E.2d 446 (Krejci v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erie Insurance Group v. Meier, 07ca0012 (10-22-2007)
2007 Ohio 5602 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Indiana Insurance v. Murphy
848 N.E.2d 889 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Mezerkor v. Mezerkor
1994 Ohio 288 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Broz v. Winland`
1994 Ohio 529 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Murrell v. Williamsburg Local School District
634 N.E.2d 263 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)