Kreitzman v. Greenbaum
This text of 269 A.D. 790 (Kreitzman v. Greenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff wife, and by her husband for expenses and loss of services, an order was made directing that the defendant be examined through an employee. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 .costs, without prejudice to plaintiffs moving to examine the superintendent as a witness, if they be so advised. An individual defendant may not be examined as an adverse party through his employee. (Rothstein v. De Simone, 267 App. Div. 771; Cole v. 1400 Broadway Corp., 267 App. Div. 93; Roberts v. Hayden, 213 App. Div. 1.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 790, 55 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kreitzman-v-greenbaum-nyappdiv-1945.