Kreiner v. Rochester R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kreiner v. Rochester R.

19 A. 934, 135 Pa. 184, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1167

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 19, 1890

DocketNo. 78

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A. 934 (Kreiner v. Rochester R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kreiner v. Rochester R., 19 A. 934, 135 Pa. 184, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1167 (Pa. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The only assignment of error is to the rejection of the certified copy of the record, No. 17 November Term 1886, of the Common Pleas of Dauphin county. No copy of this record was printed in connection with the assignment, nor does it appear elsewhere in the paper-books. It is almost needless to say [186]*186that we cannot pass upon the legal effect of a record we have never seen. Had the assignment been in conformity to the "Rule of Court, (see Rule XXIV.,) we could have considered it. As there is nothing else in the case, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The only assignment of error is to the rejection of the certified copy of the record, No. 17 November Term 1886, of the Common Pleas of Dauphin county. No copy of this record was printed in connection with the assignment, nor does it appear elsewhere in the paper-books. It is almost needless to say [186]*186that we cannot pass upon the legal effect of a record we have never seen. Had the assignment been in conformity to the "Rule of Court, (see Rule XXIV.,) we could have considered it. As there is nothing else in the case, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A. 934, 135 Pa. 184, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kreiner-v-rochester-r-pa-1890.