Kreher v. Kreher

166 So. 468, 123 Fla. 147, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 948
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 468 (Kreher v. Kreher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kreher v. Kreher, 166 So. 468, 123 Fla. 147, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 948 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on motion to dismiss appeal after brief filed by appellant because of failure of such brief to meet requirements of Amended Rule 20, of this Court.

The brief falls far short of meeting the requirements of the Rule, but an examination of the record and consideration of such brief as has been filed discloses that the only ques *148 tion presented is whether the Chancellor abused judicial discretion in dismissing a bill for divorce on final hearing after testimony was taken and submitted.

Appellant has failed to make it clearly to appear that there was an abuse of judicial discretion in the entry of the order complained of. So it should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 468, 123 Fla. 147, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kreher-v-kreher-fla-1936.