Kreher Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kreher Appeal

108 A.2d 708, 379 Pa. 313, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 358

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 8, 1954

DocketAppeals, Nos. 235 and 236

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 108 A.2d 708 (Kreher Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kreher Appeal, 108 A.2d 708, 379 Pa. 313, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 358 (Pa. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

These are appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, refusing to appoint appraisers to evaluate the stock of the appellants, A. M. Kidder & Co. and Karl Kreher, two of seven petitioners who as dissenting shareholders filed a petition pursuant to Section 908 of the Business Corporation Law of 1933, P. L. 364. After rule issued and hearing, the court below granted the relief requested as to five of the petitioners who were the registered holders of 900 shares of stock, and denied relief to the appellants. The decision of this Court in Era Co., [315]*315Ltd. v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co., 355 Pa. 219, 49 A. 2d 342, relied upon by the trial judge, is dispositive of the questions raised in these appeals.

The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Smart.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

These are appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, refusing to appoint appraisers to evaluate the stock of the appellants, A. M. Kidder & Co. and Karl Kreher, two of seven petitioners who as dissenting shareholders filed a petition pursuant to Section 908 of the Business Corporation Law of 1933, P. L. 364. After rule issued and hearing, the court below granted the relief requested as to five of the petitioners who were the registered holders of 900 shares of stock, and denied relief to the appellants. The decision of this Court in Era Co., [315]*315Ltd. v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co., 355 Pa. 219, 49 A. 2d 342, relied upon by the trial judge, is dispositive of the questions raised in these appeals.

The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Smart.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.2d 708, 379 Pa. 313, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kreher-appeal-pa-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack