Krebs v. Cabrera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krebs v. Cabrera

250 A.D.2d 736, 671 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5796

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 736 (Krebs v. Cabrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krebs v. Cabrera, 250 A.D.2d 736, 671 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for sexual abuse, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated April 30, 1997, which denied their motion for leave to vacate their default in appearing at a pretrial conference.

Ordered that the order is reversed, the motion is granted, the default is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

The defendants’ counsel was granted leave to withdraw from [737]*737this action by order dated September 11, 1995. A pretrial conference was held on January 28, 1997, at which time the defendants were held in default for their failure to appear and the matter was referred for an inquest on damages to be held on February 10, 1997. The plaintiffs’ counsel sent a letter to the defendant Gustavo Cabrera notifying him of the inquest, and Cabrera appeared pro se at the inquest.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to be relieved of the consequences of their default in appearing át the pretrial conference. The defendants’ assertion that they did not receive notice constitutes a valid and reasonable excuse for their failure to appear at the pretrial conference (see, Domlin Hair Design v La Duca, 134 AD2d 403; Conklin v Conklin, 90 AD2d 817). We find that the defendants’ default was not intentional or the result of bad faith (see, Key Bank v Lammers, 191 AD2d 615; Goldstein v Mazza, 88 AD2d 987). Furthermore, the defendants have a colorable defense.

Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for leave to vacate their default in appearing at the pretrial conference is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to decide the action on the merits. O’Brien, J. P.y Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for sexual abuse, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated April 30, 1997, which denied their motion for leave to vacate their default in appearing at a pretrial conference.

Ordered that the order is reversed, the motion is granted, the default is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

The defendants’ counsel was granted leave to withdraw from [737]*737this action by order dated September 11, 1995. A pretrial conference was held on January 28, 1997, at which time the defendants were held in default for their failure to appear and the matter was referred for an inquest on damages to be held on February 10, 1997. The plaintiffs’ counsel sent a letter to the defendant Gustavo Cabrera notifying him of the inquest, and Cabrera appeared pro se at the inquest.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to be relieved of the consequences of their default in appearing át the pretrial conference. The defendants’ assertion that they did not receive notice constitutes a valid and reasonable excuse for their failure to appear at the pretrial conference (see, Domlin Hair Design v La Duca, 134 AD2d 403; Conklin v Conklin, 90 AD2d 817). We find that the defendants’ default was not intentional or the result of bad faith (see, Key Bank v Lammers, 191 AD2d 615; Goldstein v Mazza, 88 AD2d 987). Furthermore, the defendants have a colorable defense.

Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for leave to vacate their default in appearing at the pretrial conference is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to decide the action on the merits. O’Brien, J. P.y Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 736, 671 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krebs-v-cabrera-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack