Kraynak v. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 29, 2007·No. 2007-0740·Published

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 05 MA 200, 2007-Ohio-1236. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal not accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Lundberg Stratton and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal accejoted on Proposition of Law No. Ill; cause held as to Proposition of Law No. Ill for the decision in 2007-0306, Rankin v. Cuyahoga Cty. Dept. of Children & Family Servs., [1507]*1507Cuyahoga App. No. 86620, 2006-Ohio-6759; and briefing schedule stayed as to Proposition of Law No. III.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kraynak v. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2007).

872 N.E.2d 949 (Kraynak v. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kraynak v. Youngstown City School District Board of Education
876 N.E.2d 587 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Rankin v. C.C.D.C.F.S., Unpublished Decision (12-21-2006)
2006 Ohio 6759 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)