Krawczyk v. H. S. Barney Co.
235 A.D. 647
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 235 A.D. 647 (Krawczyk v. H. S. Barney Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Krawczyk v. H. S. Barney Co., 235 A.D. 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Orders reversed on the law and the facts, with costs in one action, and the verdicts reinstated.* All concur, except Van Burk, P. J., and Hinman, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance on the ground that they are discretionary orders; there were no permanent injuries, and the verdicts were excessive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krawczyk-v-h-s-barney-co-nyappdiv-1932.