Kravitz v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

202 A.2d 64, 415 Pa. 97, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 424
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1964
DocketAppeal, 232
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 202 A.2d 64 (Kravitz v. Zoning Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kravitz v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 202 A.2d 64, 415 Pa. 97, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 424 (Pa. 1964).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

This is an appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas No. 7 of Philadelphia County refusing to quash an appeal from the Zoning Board of Adjustment (hereinafter referred to as Board).

Gerson Kravitz, trading as Normandie Cleaners, filed an application with the Board for a Certificate to use the property situate at 414-416 South 20th Street, Philadelphia, for a coin-operated laundry. On August 29, 1963, the Board rendered a decision refusing to issue the Certificate. On September 6, 1963, Kravitz’s attorney wrote to the Board requesting a re-hearing. The Board on September 16, 1963, denied the request for a re-hearing and on October 9, 1963, appellee filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Board which was granted by the lower Court.

The Board filed with the lower Court a motion to quash the appeal. The lower . Court dismissed the motion to quash and the Board thereafter appealed to this Court.

The Act of May 6, 1929, P. L. 1551, §8, 53 P.S. §14759 and §14-1806 of the Philadelphia Code, provide that the petition for certiorari “. . . shall be presented *99 to tlie court within thirty (30) days after the filing of the decision in the office of the Board ” * The time for filing the petition expired on September 28, 1963. It is Avell settled that the appeal period provided in and by the Statute and Code was not extended by the request or informal motion for re-hearing, where no stay of proceedings was granted. Smith v. Jones, 369 Pa. 13, 85 A. 2d 23; Blank v. Board of Adjustment, 390 Pa. 636, 136 A. 2d 695; Ifft v. Hunter, 202 Pa. Superior Ct. 487, 198 A. 2d 436.

The Order of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing the motion to quash is reversed and the Appeal to the Court of Common Pleas is quashed.

*

Italics, ours.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyce v. City of Scottsdale
756 P.2d 934 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1988)
Lee v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
496 A.2d 885 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Scharfman v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
340 A.2d 539 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Foltz v. Zoning Hearing Board
318 A.2d 410 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Washington Mall v. Board for the Assessment & Revision of Taxes
285 A.2d 885 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Big Bear Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Greenville
277 A.2d 166 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
In Re Annexation of a Portion of Township of Franklin
276 A.2d 549 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Christiansen v. Zoning Board of Adjustment (Philadelphia)
271 A.2d 889 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of Adjustment
215 A.2d 597 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.2d 64, 415 Pa. 97, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kravitz-v-zoning-board-of-adjustment-pa-1964.