Kravitz v. County of Rockland
This text of 490 N.E.2d 860 (Kravitz v. County of Rockland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law in denying plaintiff leave to serve late notices of claim (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 N.E.2d 860, 67 N.Y.2d 685, 499 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kravitz-v-county-of-rockland-ny-1986.