Kravetz v. United Artists Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kravetz v. United Artists Corp.

1 A.D.2d 992, 151 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5536

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 992 (Kravetz v. United Artists Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kravetz v. United Artists Corp., 1 A.D.2d 992, 151 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified to direct the dismissal of the complaint as to the defendants McNamee, Oona O’Neill Chaplin and Chemical Corn Exchange Bank, without costs as to those parties in default in the action, but, with costs in the action to those parties appearing separately and defending and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing and filing separate briefs herein. In this action in equity the plaintiff having failed to establish the right to any relief, the complaint should have been dismissed as against all parties. The failure of the judgment to specifically recite dismissal as against the bank appears to have been a clerical oversight. Orders entered May 9, 1955, and July 25, 1955, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified to direct the dismissal of the complaint as to the defendants McNamee, Oona O’Neill Chaplin and Chemical Corn Exchange Bank, without costs as to those parties in default in the action, but, with costs in the action to those parties appearing separately and defending and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing and filing separate briefs herein. In this action in equity the plaintiff having failed to establish the right to any relief, the complaint should have been dismissed as against all parties. The failure of the judgment to specifically recite dismissal as against the bank appears to have been a clerical oversight. Orders entered May 9, 1955, and July 25, 1955, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 992, 151 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kravetz-v-united-artists-corp-nyappdiv-1956.