Home/Second Circuit/Krauth v. Carter-Crume Co.

Krauth v. Carter-Crume Co.

202 F. 217, 120 C.C.A. 617, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1016
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 13, 1913·No. No. 6·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While not inclined to give as much importance as Judge Hazel does to the action of the Patent Office, we agree with him that, in view of the state of the art, neither, side hinging nor an engagement of the parts effected either by a flexible flange or by a flexible hinge constitute invention.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krauth v. Carter-Crume Co., 202 F. 217, 120 C.C.A. 617, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1016 (2d Cir. 1913).

202 F. 217 (Krauth v. Carter-Crume Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.