Krauss v. Iliescu

259 A.D.2d 468, 686 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2044
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 1, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 468 (Krauss v. Iliescu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krauss v. Iliescu, 259 A.D.2d 468, 686 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for the imposition of a constructive trust, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated April 24, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss as time-barred the second and third causes of action insofar as they related to acts which allegedly occurred prior to November 5, 1991.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[469]*469The plaintiff commenced the instant action on November 5, 1997. His second and third causes of action sought the imposition of a constructive trust based on acts which the defendants’ decedent, Louis Schoenberg, allegedly committed between 1978 and March 1992. The court granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss as time-barred the plaintiffs second and third causes of action to the extent that they related to acts which occurred prior to November 5, 1991. We affirm.

“The equitable claim for the imposition of a constructive trust is governed by the six-year Statute of Limitations of CPLR 213 (1) * * * which starts to run upon the occurrence of the wrongful act giving rise to a duty of restitution” (Sitkowski v Petzing, 175 AD2d 801, 802; see, Matter of Wallace, 191 AD2d 638, 639; Matter of Sakow, 219 AD2d 479, 482). Thus, the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiffs second and third causes of action are time-barred to the extent that they seek to impose a constructive trust for acts which occurred prior to November 5, 1991. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goco v. Ramnani
65 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Pate v. Pate
17 A.D.3d 334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Fade v. Pugliani/Fade
8 A.D.3d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Maric Piping, Inc. v. Maric
271 A.D.2d 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
64 F. Supp. 2d 233 (W.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 468, 686 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krauss-v-iliescu-nyappdiv-1999.