Krauss v. Cohen

City of New York Municipal Court

Krauss v. Cohen

20 Misc. 713, 44 N.Y.S. 1121

DecidedApril 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Misc. 713 (Krauss v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krauss v. Cohen, 20 Misc. 713, 44 N.Y.S. 1121 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Conlan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment, entered on a verdict of a jury,- and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

We have read the case and points submitted by counsel with great care, and have been unable to discover anything in the rul[714]*714ings of the court or in. the result reached by the jury on the facts that would warrant us, in disturbing the verdict, and, .therefore,, the-judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conlan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment, entered on a verdict of a jury,- and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

We have read the case and points submitted by counsel with great care, and have been unable to discover anything in the rul[714]*714ings of the court or in. the result reached by the jury on the facts that would warrant us, in disturbing the verdict, and, .therefore,, the-judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Misc. 713, 44 N.Y.S. 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krauss-v-cohen-nynyccityct-1897.