Krauser v. BioHorizons, Inc.

622 F. App'x 890
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2015
DocketNo. 13-11123
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 622 F. App'x 890 (Krauser v. BioHorizons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krauser v. BioHorizons, Inc., 622 F. App'x 890 (11th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dr. Jack Krauser appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of BioHorizons, Inc., BioLok In[891]*891ternational, Inc., and BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. (collectively, “BioHorizons”) in his lawsuit seeking a declaration that he was the owner of the subject matter set forth in a variety of BioHorizons’s patents and associated federal registrations regarding dental implant systems. On appeal, Dr. Krauser argues based on an October 1996 agreement that the district court erred in concluding that he had no contractual claim to ownership in the dental implant systems. Upon a thorough review of the briefs and record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no error and affirm based on the well-reasoned summary judgment opinion and order of the district court, entered on October 1,2012.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 F. App'x 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krauser-v-biohorizons-inc-ca11-2015.