Kraus v. Newton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Kraus v. Newton

546 A.2d 282, 208 Conn. 815, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 255

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kraus v. Newton. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 Conn. 191 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 13, 1988·Published

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 561, is granted, limited to the issue: “Did the court err in (1) refusing to mark the defendant’s statement for identification; (2) charging the jury that a landowner, without violating his/her duty to exercise reasonable care, or the safety of invitees, may, in all events, await the end of a winter storm before clearing or protecting walks and steps?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 561, is granted, limited to the issue: “Did the court err in (1) refusing to mark the defendant’s statement for identification; (2) charging the jury that a landowner, without violating his/her duty to exercise reasonable care, or the safety of invitees, may, in all events, await the end of a winter storm before clearing or protecting walks and steps?”

Kraus v. Newton, 546 A.2d 282, 208 Conn. 815, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 255 (Colo. 1988).

Pincite

546 A.2d 282 (Kraus v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related