Kraus v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 877 (Kraus v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel respondent to set aside order granting new trial.
Denied February 25, 1891, with costs.
[880]*880Relator had judgment before a justice, on a promissory noté. Defendant appeared, but was not an attorney, and did not employ one. Notice of trial by jury was served upon appellant December 17,1890, for the January term commencing January 6,1891. On December 2é, 1890, appellees served a notice of inquest, under Rule 99. On January 7, 1891, appellees took judgment under the second notice. The appellant was in court on the 6th and 7th waiting for his case to be called, but it was not called, and he did not hear the colloquy between court and counsel respecting the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraus-v-circuit-judge-mich-1891.