Kraus v. Bouges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kraus v. Bouges

8 A.D.2d 632, 185 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9155

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 632 (Kraus v. Bouges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kraus v. Bouges, 8 A.D.2d 632, 185 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9155 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, by permission of this court, from an order of the Appellate Term which affirmed an order of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, Second District, denying appellant’s motion to set aside a final order of that court and for a new trial. The order sought to be vacated and set aside determined a summary proceeding to recover possession of an apartment in a multiple dwelling. Respondent instituted the summary proceeding on the grounds that appellant, the tenant therein, had violated her agreement to keep the apartment painted and in repair, and had refused to allow respondent to enter and make necessary repairs. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, by permission of this court, from an order of the Appellate Term which affirmed an order of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, Second District, denying appellant’s motion to set aside a final order of that court and for a new trial. The order sought to be vacated and set aside determined a summary proceeding to recover possession of an apartment in a multiple dwelling. Respondent instituted the summary proceeding on the grounds that appellant, the tenant therein, had violated her agreement to keep the apartment painted and in repair, and had refused to allow respondent to enter and make necessary repairs. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 632, 185 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraus-v-bouges-nyappdiv-1959.