Kraus v. B. Gertz, Inc.

38 A.D.2d 857, 330 N.Y.S.2d 601
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 1972·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the 'Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 30, 1971, which dismissed her complaint upon the trial court’s decision at the close of the evidence upon a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have not been considered. In our opinion, plaintiff made out a prima facie case. She allegedly slipped and fell on a wet floor adjacent to a water fountain in defendant’s department store. The proof adduced was sufficient from which the inferences could reasonably be drawn that the condition was a recurring one; that defendant, through its employees, had actual notice of the condition; and that the failure to take protective measures constituted negligence. The issues of whether defendant’s employee mopped the floor only minutes before the accident and whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence are for the jury. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kraus v. B. Gertz, Inc., 38 A.D.2d 857, 330 N.Y.S.2d 601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

38 A.D.2d 857 (Kraus v. B. Gertz, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorsa v. National Amusements, Inc.
6 A.D.3d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Freund v. Ross-Rodney Housing Corp.
292 A.D.2d 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Reece v. City of New York
284 A.D.2d 519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)