Kratz v. Lien

Ohio Court of Appeals

Kratz v. Lien

44 N.E.2d 822, 37 Ohio Law. Abs. 25, 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 1120

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided October 1, 1940·No. No. 3337·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Examination of the evidence adduced herein, convinces the members of this court that the real estate sought to be sold is being sold by The Sumner Property Co., a distinct corporate entity, and not by the superintendent of banks of Ohio.

Compliance with the provisions of §710-95 GC, is not required of private corporations.

The prayer of the petition of the plaintiff (appellant) is denied, and the petition dismissed, at appellant’s costs.

WASHBURN, PJ., DOYLE, J., & STEVENS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Examination of the evidence adduced herein, convinces the members of this court that the real estate sought to be sold is being sold by The Sumner Property Co., a distinct corporate entity, and not by the superintendent of banks of Ohio.

Compliance with the provisions of §710-95 GC, is not required of private corporations.

The prayer of the petition of the plaintiff (appellant) is denied, and the petition dismissed, at appellant’s costs.

WASHBURN, PJ., DOYLE, J., & STEVENS, J., concur.

Kratz v. Lien, 44 N.E.2d 822, 37 Ohio Law. Abs. 25, 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 1120 (Ohio Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

44 N.E.2d 822 (Kratz v. Lien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.