Krastes v. Haseley Construction Company, Inc.
756 N.W.2d 67, 482 Mich. 996
Opinion
Shelly M. KRASTES, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Auto Club of Michigan, Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
HASELEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Reliance Insurance Company, Inc., and Michigan Property & Guaranty Association, Defendants-Appellees, and
Graycor Services, American Risk Funding Insurance Company, Fluor Corporation, and Continental Casualty Company, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krastes v. Haseley Construction Company, Inc., 756 N.W.2d 67, 482 Mich. 996 (Mich. 2008).
756 N.W.2d 67 (Krastes v. Haseley Construction Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.