Krasnosky v. Morgan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Krasnosky v. Morgan

272 So. 2d 874

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1973·No. No. S-50·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See M R & R Trucking Company v. Griffin (Fla.App.1967) 198 So.2d 879; Weiss v. Jacobson (Fla.1953) 62 So.2d 904; Riddle v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co. (Fla.1954) 73 So.2d 71; Reece v. Ebersbach (1942), 152 Fla. 763, 9 So.2d 805.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See M R & R Trucking Company v. Griffin (Fla.App.1967) 198 So.2d 879; Weiss v. Jacobson (Fla.1953) 62 So.2d 904; Riddle v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co. (Fla.1954) 73 So.2d 71; Reece v. Ebersbach (1942), 152 Fla. 763, 9 So.2d 805.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Krasnosky v. Morgan, 272 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

272 So. 2d 874 (Krasnosky v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related