Krasniaski v. Alter Native Retail, LLC

S.D. Florida

Krasniaski v. Alter Native Retail, LLC

DecidedApril 24, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-20450

StatusUnknown

This text of Krasniaski v. Alter Native Retail, LLC (Krasniaski v. Alter Native Retail, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krasniaski v. Alter Native Retail, LLC, (S.D. Fla. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 23-cv-20450-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

NECHAMA KRASNIASKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALTER NATIVE RETAIL, LLC, et al.,

Defendants. _____________________________/

ORDER TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of the summons and complaint to be perfected upon defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint.1 On December 29, 2022, Krasniaski sued her former employers, Alter Native Retail, LLC (“ANR”), Shaya Boymelgreen, and Elyakim Boymelgreen in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County. See ECF No. [1-1]. On February 3, 2023, ANR removed this case to federal court. ECF No. [1]. According to the Notice of Removal, Shaya Boymelgreen and Elyakim Boymelgreen (“Defendants”) had not been served as of the date of removal. ECF No. [1] at 3. The Court sees no indication that they have been served since. Assuming that Rule 4(m)’s 90-day service period began on the date the case was removed to federal court, see Igbinigie v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:08-CV-58, 2008 WL 4862597, at

1 The 90-day timeframe does not apply to service of process upon parties in a foreign country. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (“This subdivision (m) does not apply to service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f), 4(h)(2), or 4(j)(1), or to service of a notice under Rule 71.1(d)(3)(A).”). Case No. 23-cv-20450-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

*3 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 10, 2008), Plaintiffs deadline to serve Defendants is, at the latest, May 4, 2023. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, within seven (7) days of perfecting service upon Defendants, Plaintiff shall file proof of such service with the Court. Failure to effectuate service of a summons and the complaint on Defendants by that deadline will result in dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on April 24, 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 23-cv-20450-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

NECHAMA KRASNIASKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALTER NATIVE RETAIL, LLC, et al.,

Defendants. _____________________________/

ORDER TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of the summons and complaint to be perfected upon defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint.1 On December 29, 2022, Krasniaski sued her former employers, Alter Native Retail, LLC (“ANR”), Shaya Boymelgreen, and Elyakim Boymelgreen in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County. See ECF No. [1-1]. On February 3, 2023, ANR removed this case to federal court. ECF No. [1]. According to the Notice of Removal, Shaya Boymelgreen and Elyakim Boymelgreen (“Defendants”) had not been served as of the date of removal. ECF No. [1] at 3. The Court sees no indication that they have been served since. Assuming that Rule 4(m)’s 90-day service period began on the date the case was removed to federal court, see Igbinigie v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:08-CV-58, 2008 WL 4862597, at

1 The 90-day timeframe does not apply to service of process upon parties in a foreign country. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (“This subdivision (m) does not apply to service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f), 4(h)(2), or 4(j)(1), or to service of a notice under Rule 71.1(d)(3)(A).”). Case No. 23-cv-20450-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

*3 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 10, 2008), Plaintiffs deadline to serve Defendants is, at the latest, May 4, 2023. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, within seven (7) days of perfecting service upon Defendants, Plaintiff shall file proof of such service with the Court. Failure to effectuate service of a summons and the complaint on Defendants by that deadline will result in dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on April 24, 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: Counsel of Record

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Krasniaski v. Alter Native Retail, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krasniaski-v-alter-native-retail-llc-flsd-2023.