Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, Inc.

64 A.D.2d 549

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 549 (Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, Inc., 64 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 23, 1977, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granting defendant Ben-Ness Cameras & Electronics Center, Inc., summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs ánd disbursements, to the extent of denying summary judgment to defendant Ben-Ness Cameras & Electronics Center, Inc., dismissing the complaint and the motion denied in all respects without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers which shall include a copy of the pleadings, and otherwise affirmed. CPLR 3212 (subd [b]) provides that a motion for summary judgment shall be supported by a copy of the pleadings. The pleadings are a requisite part of the record of a CPLR 3212 motion (see 4 Weinstein-KornMiller, NY Civ Prac, par 3212.10). Not only are the pleadings not part of the record of the instant motion, they appear to have not as yet been filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 23, 1977, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granting defendant Ben-Ness Cameras & Electronics Center, Inc., summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs ánd disbursements, to the extent of denying summary judgment to defendant Ben-Ness Cameras & Electronics Center, Inc., dismissing the complaint and the motion denied in all respects without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers which shall include a copy of the pleadings, and otherwise affirmed. CPLR 3212 (subd [b]) provides that a motion for summary judgment shall be supported by a copy of the pleadings. The pleadings are a requisite part of the record of a CPLR 3212 motion (see 4 Weinstein-KornMiller, NY Civ Prac, par 3212.10). Not only are the pleadings not part of the record of the instant motion, they appear to have not as yet been filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krasner-v-transcontinental-equities-inc-nyappdiv-1978.