Krasner v. Rowe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Krasner v. Rowe

561 So. 2d 1268, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3662, 1990 WL 67300

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1990

DocketNo. 88-1423

StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 1268 (Krasner v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krasner v. Rowe, 561 So. 2d 1268, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3662, 1990 WL 67300 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a post-trial order setting aside a jury verdict for the defen[1269]*1269dant, and directing a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Because there is competent substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict, we reverse and remand with directions that the jury verdict be reinstated and judgment entered thereon. See Stirling v. Sapp, 229 So.2d 850 (Fla.1969).

ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a post-trial order setting aside a jury verdict for the defen[1269]*1269dant, and directing a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Because there is competent substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict, we reverse and remand with directions that the jury verdict be reinstated and judgment entered thereon. See Stirling v. Sapp, 229 So.2d 850 (Fla.1969).

ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 So. 2d 1268, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3662, 1990 WL 67300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krasner-v-rowe-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack