Krarup v. Ohlwiler

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Krarup v. Ohlwiler

539 So. 2d 1188, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1464, 1989 WL 25345

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 23, 1989

DocketNo. 88-1233

StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 1188 (Krarup v. Ohlwiler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krarup v. Ohlwiler, 539 So. 2d 1188, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1464, 1989 WL 25345 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment. Because there are various vital disputed factual issues to be resolved it was error to enter the summary judgment. Among the issues is whether sufficient notice and due process was granted appellee in a foreign country to warrant recognition of the foreign judgment in Florida. It is [1189]*1189improper to enter a summary judgment when disputed material issues of fact exist.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment. Because there are various vital disputed factual issues to be resolved it was error to enter the summary judgment. Among the issues is whether sufficient notice and due process was granted appellee in a foreign country to warrant recognition of the foreign judgment in Florida. It is [1189]*1189improper to enter a summary judgment when disputed material issues of fact exist.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 So. 2d 1188, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1464, 1989 WL 25345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krarup-v-ohlwiler-fladistctapp-1989.