Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co.

California Court of Appeal

Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co.

185 P. 305, 43 Cal. App. 441, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 741

California Court of Appeal·Decided October 4, 1919·No. Civ. No. 2371.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The facts bring this case directly within the rule stated inMortgage Securities Co. of California v. Pfaffmann, 177 Cal. 109, [L.R.A. 1918D, 118, 169 P. 1033]. It was there held that the possessory lien of one who repairs personal property, at the request of the owner or legal possessor thereof, is superior to the lien and right of possession of the owner of a pre-existing chattel mortgage. On the authority of that decision the judgment in this action is affirmed.

Shaw, J., and James, J., concurred.

*Page 442

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The facts bring this case directly within the rule stated inMortgage Securities Co. of California v. Pfaffmann, 177 Cal. 109, [L.R.A. 1918D, 118, 169 P. 1033]. It was there held that the possessory lien of one who repairs personal property, at the request of the owner or legal possessor thereof, is superior to the lien and right of possession of the owner of a pre-existing chattel mortgage. On the authority of that decision the judgment in this action is affirmed.

Shaw, J., and James, J., concurred.

*Page 442

Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co., 185 P. 305, 43 Cal. App. 441, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 741 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

185 P. 305 (Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related