Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co.

California Court of Appeal

Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co.

43 Cal. App. 441

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 4, 1919

DocketCiv. No. 2371

StatusPublished

This text of 43 Cal. App. 441 (Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kranzthor v. Al. G. Faulkner Co., 43 Cal. App. 441 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

CONREY, P. J.

The facts bring this case directly within the rule stated in Mortgage Securities Co. of California v. Pfaffmann, 177 Cal. 109, [L. R. A. 1918D, 118, 169 Pac. 1033], It was there held that the possessory lien of one who repairs personal property, at the request of the owner or legal possessor thereof, is superior to the lien and right of possession of the owner of a pre-existing chattel mortgage. On the authority of that decision the judgment in this action is affirmed.

Shaw, J., and James, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONREY, P. J.

The facts bring this case directly within the rule stated in Mortgage Securities Co. of California v. Pfaffmann, 177 Cal. 109, [L. R. A. 1918D, 118, 169 Pac. 1033], It was there held that the possessory lien of one who repairs personal property, at the request of the owner or legal possessor thereof, is superior to the lien and right of possession of the owner of a pre-existing chattel mortgage. On the authority of that decision the judgment in this action is affirmed.

Shaw, J., and James, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Cal. App. 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kranzthor-v-al-g-faulkner-co-calctapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack