Kranich v. Reynolds
11 Jones & S. 576
This text of 11 Jones & S. 576 (Kranich v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kranich v. Reynolds, 11 Jones & S. 576 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).
Opinion
wrote for affirmance, holding: As to the first question in the head-note that it was not; as to the second, that he was not bound to make such finding; and as to the third, that such fact was not of such controlling importance as to call on the referee to discredit the evidence.
Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Jones & S. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kranich-v-reynolds-nysuperctnyc-1878.