Kranich v. Reynolds
11 Jones & S. 576
Opinion
wrote for affirmance, holding: As to the first question in the head-note that it was not; as to the second, that he was not bound to make such finding; and as to the third, that such fact was not of such controlling importance as to call on the referee to discredit the evidence.
Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kranich v. Reynolds, 11 Jones & S. 576 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).
11 Jones & S. 576 (Kranich v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.