Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

820 A.2d 700

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 584 Pa. 309 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 3, 2003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted. The Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is also hereby granted, limited to the following issue:

Whether the defendant’s offsetting of compensation benefits by the “severance” pay was a violation of the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions, where the offset violated the equal protection clause?

[701]*701The Application for Supersedeas is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted. The Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is also hereby granted, limited to the following issue:

Whether the defendant’s offsetting of compensation benefits by the “severance” pay was a violation of the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions, where the offset violated the equal protection clause?

[701]*701The Application for Supersedeas is hereby denied.

Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 820 A.2d 700 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

820 A.2d 700 (Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.