Kramer v. Sheehy

Supreme Court

Kramer v. Sheehy

316 U.S. 646, 62 S. Ct. 1283

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 25, 1942

DocketNo. 1202

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 316 U.S. 646 (Kramer v. Sheehy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kramer v. Sheehy, 316 U.S. 646, 62 S. Ct. 1283 (1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nevada.

Per Curiam:

The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. It finds that the attack upon the validity of the state statute raises no substantial federal question (Wolfgang v. California, 270 U. S. 627, and cases cited), and that none of the other questions presented warrant further review. The motion to dismiss is therefore granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nevada.

Per Curiam:

The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. It finds that the attack upon the validity of the state statute raises no substantial federal question (Wolfgang v. California, 270 U. S. 627, and cases cited), and that none of the other questions presented warrant further review. The motion to dismiss is therefore granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 U.S. 646, 62 S. Ct. 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-sheehy-scotus-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack