Kramer v. Sheehy
316 U.S. 646, 62 S. Ct. 1283
Opinion
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nevada.
The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. It finds that the attack upon the validity of the state statute raises no substantial federal question (Wolfgang v. California, 270 U. S. 627, and cases cited), and that none of the other questions presented warrant further review. The motion to dismiss is therefore granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kramer v. Sheehy, 316 U.S. 646, 62 S. Ct. 1283 (1942).
316 U.S. 646 (Kramer v. Sheehy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. White
487 P.2d 243 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1971)
Diggs v. Welch
148 F.2d 667 (D.C. Circuit, 1945)