Kramer v. Petisi
888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 916, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 495
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 3, 2005
DocketSC 17549
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 888 A.2d 84 (Kramer v. Petisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kramer v. Petisi, 888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 916, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 495 (Colo. 2005).
Opinion
The named plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 26 (AC 24698), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly apply the law of comparative negligence to the named plaintiffs claims of misrepresentation against the defendants?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kramer v. Petisi
940 A.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 916, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-petisi-conn-2005.