Kramer v. Petisi

888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 916, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 495
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 3, 2005·No. SC 17549·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The named plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn. App. 26 (AC 24698), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly apply the law of comparative negligence to the named plaintiffs claims of misrepresentation against the defendants?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kramer v. Petisi, 888 A.2d 84, 276 Conn. 916, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 495 (Colo. 2005).

888 A.2d 84 (Kramer v. Petisi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kramer v. Petisi
940 A.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)