Kramer v. Ohio
320 U.S. 711, 64 S. Ct. 192
Opinion
The motion for leave to file statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. McNaughton v. Johnson, 242 U. S. 344, 348-9; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 428; Roschen v. Ward, 279 U. S. 337, 339-40; Semler v. Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608, 611. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kramer v. Ohio, 320 U.S. 711, 64 S. Ct. 192 (1943).
320 U.S. 711 (Kramer v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McNaughton v. Johnson
242 U.S. 344 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Graves v. Minnesota
272 U.S. 425 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Roschen v. Ward
279 U.S. 337 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners
294 U.S. 608 (Supreme Court, 1935)