Kramer v. News Syndicate Co.
This text of 32 N.E.2d 552 (Kramer v. News Syndicate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The majority of the court are agreed that the question of whether the plaintiff is entitled to any damages is one of fact rather than of law. We are all agreed that there should be a new trial on the ground *560 that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of the witness Daniel.
The judgment of the trial court and the judgment of dismissal of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 N.E.2d 552, 284 N.Y. 557, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-news-syndicate-co-ny-1940.