Kramer v. News Syndicate Co.

32 N.E.2d 552, 284 N.Y. 557, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 827
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The majority of the court are agreed that the question of whether the plaintiff is entitled to any damages is one of fact rather than of law. We are all agreed that there should be a new trial on the ground *560 that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of the witness Daniel.

The judgment of the trial court and the judgment of dismissal of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kramer v. News Syndicate Co., 32 N.E.2d 552, 284 N.Y. 557, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 827 (N.Y. 1940).

32 N.E.2d 552 (Kramer v. News Syndicate Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related