Kramer v. Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kramer v. Kramer

263 A.D. 727, 31 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 727 (Kramer v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kramer v. Kramer, 263 A.D. 727, 31 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, in so far as it grants defendant’s motion to modify the judgment of separation rendered in favor of plaintiff and reduces the alimony from forty-five dollars to thirty-five dollars a week, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. In our opinion there was not such a change in defendant’s circumstances as to warrant the reduction made by the Special Term. In so far as the order allows plaintiff the sum of twenty-five dollars counsel fees in opposing the motion, it is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, in so far as it grants defendant’s motion to modify the judgment of separation rendered in favor of plaintiff and reduces the alimony from forty-five dollars to thirty-five dollars a week, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. In our opinion there was not such a change in defendant’s circumstances as to warrant the reduction made by the Special Term. In so far as the order allows plaintiff the sum of twenty-five dollars counsel fees in opposing the motion, it is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 727, 31 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-kramer-nyappdiv-1941.