Kramer v. Hubbell

269 A.D. 759, 54 N.Y.S.2d 739
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 30, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 759 (Kramer v. Hubbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kramer v. Hubbell, 269 A.D. 759, 54 N.Y.S.2d 739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Order insofar as it denies the motion by individual defendants, under rule 90 [760]*760of the Rules of Civil Practice to compel the plaintiff separately to state and number the causes of action contained in the present amended complaint, under rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice to make certain allegations more definite and certain, and under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out certain allegations as irrelevant, etc., reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, to the extent of requiring the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint in which there shall be separately stated and numbered the two or more causes of action now mingled together, to wit: (1) The cause of action against defendants Ella Hubbell and Yictoria Miller, copartners doing business as The Convalite Company, for breach of the contract; (2) the cause of action against such of defendants as the plaintiff claims are liable for wrongfully inducing the breach of the contract; and (3) if the plaintiff contends that the matters alleged in paragraphs “ Twenty-Sixth ” and “ Twenty-Seventh ” of the present complaint rendered any of defendants liable to the plaintiff independent of the claimed wrong in inducing the breach of the contract, then separately stating and numbering such alleged cause 'of action. This disposition makes it unnecessary to consider the balance of the motion." No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. Brown
14 A.D.2d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Alpert v. Hein
8 Misc. 2d 1010 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 759, 54 N.Y.S.2d 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-hubbell-nyappdiv-1945.