Kramer v. Horowitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kramer v. Horowitz

111 N.Y.S. 697

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1908

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 N.Y.S. 697 (Kramer v. Horowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kramer v. Horowitz, 111 N.Y.S. 697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

The defendant moved by an order to show cause for the opening of his default wherein a judgment was entered against him, proposing in his motion that the- judgment entered stand as-security as a money judgment, or that, in the alternative, the words “Defendant subject to arrest and imprisonment” be stricken out of the judgment and of the docket thereof. .Thereupon was entered an order that the motion was granted upon condition that the defendant deposited with the clerk within days named the amount of the judgment, to be security for any judgment obtained by the plaintiff, with a denial of the motion upon noncompliance with the condition. This is the order appealed from. Tf it be treated as one opening a default, [698]*698it is not appealable. If it be treated as a denial, as the judgment debt- or would half have it, the order is appealable; but the appellant should not be relieved from the condition imposed by the court, within section 256 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1563, c. 580). Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

GILDERSLEEVE P. J., concurs. SEABURY, J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

The defendant moved by an order to show cause for the opening of his default wherein a judgment was entered against him, proposing in his motion that the- judgment entered stand as-security as a money judgment, or that, in the alternative, the words “Defendant subject to arrest and imprisonment” be stricken out of the judgment and of the docket thereof. .Thereupon was entered an order that the motion was granted upon condition that the defendant deposited with the clerk within days named the amount of the judgment, to be security for any judgment obtained by the plaintiff, with a denial of the motion upon noncompliance with the condition. This is the order appealed from. Tf it be treated as one opening a default, [698]*698it is not appealable. If it be treated as a denial, as the judgment debt- or would half have it, the order is appealable; but the appellant should not be relieved from the condition imposed by the court, within section 256 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1563, c. 580). Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

GILDERSLEEVE P. J., concurs. SEABURY, J., concurs in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 N.Y.S. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-horowitz-nyappterm-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack