Kramer v. Geldwert

123 A.D.3d 507, 996 N.Y.S.2d 530
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2014·No. 13760 602837/09·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered December 12, 2013, which denied plaintiff’s motion for discovery in aid of arbitration and dismissed the matter, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In exceptional circumstances, pre-hearing discovery pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c) may be ordered after the demand for arbitration has been made (see e.g. Matter of Moock v Emanuel, 99 AD2d 1003 [1st Dept 1984]). However, a court may not review the interim orders of an arbitrator (Mobil Oil Indonesia v Asamera Oil [Indonesia], 43 NY2d 276 [1977]). Thus, judicial review of procedural rulings made in this arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association is barred (see Avon Prods. v Solow, 150 AD2d 236, 239 [1st Dept 1989]).

Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Friedman, Acosta and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kramer v. Geldwert, 123 A.D.3d 507, 996 N.Y.S.2d 530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

123 A.D.3d 507 (Kramer v. Geldwert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobil Oil Indonesia Inc. v. Asamera Oil (Indonesia) Ltd.
372 N.E.2d 21 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Moock v. Emanuel
99 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Avon Products, Inc. v. Solow
150 A.D.2d 236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)