Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/Kramer v. Freedman

Kramer v. Freedman

295 So. 2d 97, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 3960
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 10, 1973
DocketNo. 43442
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 295 So. 2d 97 (Kramer v. Freedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kramer v. Freedman, 295 So. 2d 97, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 3960 (La. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., AND ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Solon v. Slater
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2023
Klem v. ESPEJO-NORTON
983 So. 2d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Espejo-Norton v. Merry
869 So. 2d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Shakarian v. Daum
561 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Bergman v. Serns
560 So. 2d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Abreu v. Amaro
534 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Freedman v. Horton, Schwartz & Perse
383 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Evelyn G. Dewitt and Mabel M. Dewitt v. Estelle R. Duce, Dallas W. Weaver and Mabel E. Weaver
599 F.2d 676 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 So. 2d 97, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 3960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-freedman-lactapp-1973.