Kramer v. City of Lakeland

38 So. 2d 126, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 1037
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 38 So. 2d 126 (Kramer v. City of Lakeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kramer v. City of Lakeland, 38 So. 2d 126, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 1037 (Fla. 1948).

Opinion

Suit by Al G. Kramer and others against City of Lakeland, Florida, a municipal corporation, and another to enjoin construction of a building in public park. From a decree adjudging that city could abrogate use of the property as a park and devote it to other public use and could convey it to Federal government for federal building purposes, or other public purposes, plaintiffs appeal.

Decree reversed with directions. On February 26, 1884, Abraham G. Munn was the fee simple owner of the W 1/2 of SW 1/4 of Section 18, Tp. 28 South, Range 24 East situated in Polk County, Florida. He surveyed the property and caused it to be subdivided into blocks and lots and designated streets and avenues, and assigned to each an appropriate name. He prepared a map thereof and caused the same to be recorded among the public records of Polk County, Florida. The City of Lakeland, in part, is now located on the above described land.

The map placed of record identifies Block 14 as a public square and continuously since has been known as Munn's Park. It is bounded on the north by Cedar Street; on the south by Main Street; on the east by Kentucky Avenue, and on the west by Tennessee Avenue. Block 14, supra, at the present time is being used by the public as a park and has been continuously so used since 1884. It is admitted that Block 14 was by the owner in 1884 dedicated to the public to be used by it for park purposes.

The record reflects the following:

"DeLand, Florida, March 7th, 1898. At a call meeting of the Lakeland Improvement Company of Polk County, Florida, held this day at DeLand, Florida. Present, A.G. Munn in the chair appointed Morris G. Munn, secretary pro tem.

"The president stated that while in Lakeland on Sunday, March 5th, he was informed that some doubt was expressed by several citizens of Lakeland about the title to the Public Square, or Block 14 in *Page 127 that City, whereupon the president stated that in filing the map of the town survey of his son, Samuel M. Munn, surveyor of same, in the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court of Polk County at Bartow, the land bounded on the south by Main Street, on the east by Kentucky Avenue, on the north by Cedar Street and on the west by Tennessee Avenue, was on that plat designated as Public or Town Square in the town of Lakeland, Polk County, Florida, and came under the supervision and care of the mayor and town council in the same manner as the streets and alleys of said town filed as such on the same map at the same time the Lakeland Improvement Company, after clearing, plowing, fencing and setting in Bermuda grass, and planting water oaks around said public or town square, has never made and does not now make or reserve any claim of ownership to any part or portion of said square; but states officially that its interest in said plat of land is the same as every other lot in the town, now City of Lakeland.

"It admits, however, that two small squares or lots were drawn by the surveyor to intimate that should at any future time the citizens or their lawfully constituted mayor and council should deem it for the interest of the city to use any portion of said square for the erection of public buildings for the use of either state, county municipality as well as for a public park; it would be as agreeable to the Lakeland Improvement Company as to the citizens generally in said city.

"Thereupon on motion of W.B. Munn, a stockholder in said corporation, seconded by Morris G. Munn, also a stockholder in said corporation, who, with A.G. Munn, hold a large majority of its stock, it was resolved that the Lakeland Improvement Company endorse in every word and particular the statement now made by President A.G. Munn and that the plat of the public or town square in the town of Lakeland as filed in the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court of Polk County, Florida, belongs to all the lot owners individually and collectively for the purpose set forth in his statement and for no other. This statement and resolution to be entered of record in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Polk County, Florida."

On September 11, 1924, the City Commission or Council, through its authorized officials, enacted or attempted the enactment of an ordinance by the terms and provisions of which it was sought to sell, abandon or otherwise dispose of Munn's Park so that the same should pass into the ownership and control of private parties. Pursuant thereto a deed was executed and delivered by the Lakeland Improvement Company to the Central Bank Trust Company which purported to sell or dispose of Munn's Park, to the alleged injury and damage of the citizens and residents of the City of Lakeland and to the general public.

Certain named citizens of Lakeland in 1924 filed suit in the Circuit Court of Polk County, Florida, against the City of Lakeland, Lakeland Improvement Company and the Central Bank Trust Company praying for an order decreeing as void ab initio the ordinance authorizing an abandonment of Munn's Park and the sale thereof to the Central Bank Trust Company, and that the defendants be permanently enjoined from diverting the use and enjoyment of Munn Park by the public for any purposes other than for which it was originally dedicated by Abraham G. Munn and his company, the Lakeland Improvement Company, in 1884 and rededicated in 1898. These defendants were enjoined from so doing and an appeal was not taken from the order or decree.

The Court's opinion, in part, is viz.:

"It was admitted at said hearing that said park or public square has been used by the public, also improved, beautified with a monument, fountains, walks and shrubbery, continuously since 1884 — also since 1898 when the dedication was reaffirmed by resolution stated above and recorded.

"The bill for injunction avers, and attached exhibits to same show, that the city commissioners of Lakeland have passed an ordinance having for its purpose to effect a surrender or abandonment of said parcel of land as a public park or *Page 128 square, and that the grantor of said public park or square has executed a deed of trust to the Central Bank and Trust Company of Lakeland authorizing the sale of same to private owners.

"Upon consideration of the issues raised by the demurrer to said bill it appearing to the Court that the petitioners for injunction are proper parties complainant in this cause and under the facts stated in the bill that the original owner, Abraham G. Munn, and his successors, the Lakeland Improvement Company, are precluded from revoking this dedication, it being shown that the said public square or park was set apart as such for public use and enjoyed as such and that rights have been acquired with reference to it, such as lots conveyed according to the plat which shows a square dedicated to public use and accepted by the public for a period of about forty years by user; it further appears from the bill that such dedication was originally made and recorded by an individual not only to the public, but also to individual lot owners for a specific use as a public square park and duly accepted; it further appears that a statute such as Section 1851, Revised General Statutes of Florida, F.S.A. § 167.09, authority relied upon by defendants in argument before the court, has no power to divert the property in question to any purpose inconsistent to the particular use to which it was dedicated and such dedication is irrevocable; that specific contractual rights accrued immediately upon the lots being sold according to said plat; that the City of Lakeland having no fee title would hold this property thus dedicated, not in a proprietary but in its sovereign capacity in trust only for the use to which it was dedicated."

On April 26, 1943, Morris G. Munn and W.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Emami v. Progressive Brands, Inc.
225 So. 3d 983 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
City of Daytona Beach v. Tuttle
630 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
City of Coral Gables v. Old Cutler Bay Homeowners Corp.
529 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Hollywood, Inc. v. Zinkil
403 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Rushing v. Garrett
375 So. 2d 903 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1977
Goff v. Indian Lake Estates, Inc.
178 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Bursten v. Green
172 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Palm Beach Royal Hotel, Inc. v. Breese
154 So. 2d 698 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Kumick v. City of St. Petersburg
136 So. 2d 5 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Florida Little Major League Ass'n v. Gulfport Lion's Little League, Inc.
127 So. 2d 707 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 So. 2d 126, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-city-of-lakeland-fla-1948.