Kramer v. Berkshire Life Insurance
This text of 228 A.D.2d 169 (Kramer v. Berkshire Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s evidence of the materiality of the misrepresentations in the application for the subject life insurance policy being less than "clear and substantially uncontradicted”, its motion for summary judgment was properly denied (Continental Ins. Co. v RLI Ins. Co., 161 AD2d 385, 387). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D.2d 169, 643 N.Y.2d 338, 643 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-berkshire-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1996.