Kramer v. Alterra Mountain Company
This text of Kramer v. Alterra Mountain Company (Kramer v. Alterra Mountain Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 20-cv-01057-RM-SKC
ROBERT STEPHEN KRAMER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALTERRA MOUNTAIN COMPANY and IKON PASS INC.,
Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Consolidate (the “Motion”) (ECF No. 19) seeking to consolidate five other actions pending in this District with the above- captioned case for pretrial proceedings. The Motion was filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1. Pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in actions which involve “a common question of law or fact,” the court may consolidate the actions or issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay. Under this District’s Local Rules, “[a] motion to consolidate…shall be decided by the district judge to whom the lowest numbered case is assigned.” D.C.COLO.LCivR. 42.1. Whether to consolidate is vested in the broad discretion of the district court. American Employers’ Ins. Co. v. King Res. Co., 545 F.2d 1265, 1269 (10th Cir. 1976). The parties’ contend, and the Court’s review finds, the six actions involve common questions of law or fact. Specifically, all actions at issue are putative class actions against the above-named Defendants which seek to recover the unused value of certain ski passes following the COVID-19 closures. Although some of the claims may vary, all actions include claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Accordingly, it is ORDERED (1) That the Joint Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED; (2) That pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a)(2) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, the related actions Eckert v. Alterra Mountain Co. and Ikon Pass, Inc., No. 1:20-cv- 01158-NYW, Farmer y. Alterra Mountain Company U.S. Inc. and Ikon Pass, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-01175-DDD-MEH, Cleaver v. Alterra Mountain Co. and Ikon Pass, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-01186-RBJ, Werner et al. vy. Alterra Mountain Co. and Ikon Pass, Inc., No. 1:20- cv-01254-SKC, and Steijn et al. v. Alterra Mountain Co. U.S. Inc., No. 1:20-ev-01347- SKC are consolidated with the above-captioned action for pretrial proceedings; (3) That Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews shall be the sole referral magistrate judge in this action consolidated for pretrial purposes; (4) That all papers in this consolidated action shall be filed in the lowest case number, No. 20-cv-01057-RM-SKC; and (5) That this Order shall also be filed in the five related cases set forth in number (2) above. DATED this 18th day of May, 2020. BY THE COURT:
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kramer v. Alterra Mountain Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-v-alterra-mountain-company-cod-2020.