Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 18, 2022·No. 113 MAL 2022 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

STEWART KRAMER AND VALERIE : No. 113 MAL 2022 CONICELLO :

: : Petition for Allowance of Appeal v. : from the Order of the Superior Court : :

NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND : CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. AND LAURIE : CRUZ, ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE : ESTATE OF MICHAEL T. MURPHY, JR., : DECEASED, AND ADAM KRAMER :

: :

PETITION OF: NATIONWIDE PROPERTY : AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue:

Did the Superior Court incorrectly rule that emotional distress damages are covered under an insurance policy providing liability coverage only for “bodily injury,” even when the policy itself excludes emotional distress from the definition of bodily injury?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop., (Pa. 2022).

Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop. (Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.