Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop.
This text of Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop. (Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
STEWART KRAMER AND VALERIE : No. 113 MAL 2022 CONICELLO : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal v. : from the Order of the Superior Court : : NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND : CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. AND LAURIE : CRUZ, ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE : ESTATE OF MICHAEL T. MURPHY, JR., : DECEASED, AND ADAM KRAMER : : : PETITION OF: NATIONWIDE PROPERTY : AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue:
Did the Superior Court incorrectly rule that emotional distress damages are covered under an insurance policy providing liability coverage only for “bodily injury,” even when the policy itself excludes emotional distress from the definition of bodily injury?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Prop., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramer-s-v-nationwide-prop-pa-2022.