Kramb v. Fincher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kramb v. Fincher

277 A.D.2d 940

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 940 (Kramb v. Fincher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kramb v. Fincher, 277 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered June 17, 1949, insofar as appealed from, and judgment entered June 1, 1949, dismissing the complaint as to defendant Roder, affirmed, with costs. Judgment entered June 1, 1949, in favor of plaintiff against defendants Vowles, Wride, and West, reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the jury’s verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence in the case; appeal from order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial dismissed as academic. All concur. (In an action to recover real estate commissions, appeal by certain defendants from a judgment for plaintiff and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial; also appeal by plaintiff from part of a judgment dismissing as to certain defendants; also appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant Roder.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCum, Love, Yaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See post, p. 962.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered June 17, 1949, insofar as appealed from, and judgment entered June 1, 1949, dismissing the complaint as to defendant Roder, affirmed, with costs. Judgment entered June 1, 1949, in favor of plaintiff against defendants Vowles, Wride, and West, reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the jury’s verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence in the case; appeal from order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial dismissed as academic. All concur. (In an action to recover real estate commissions, appeal by certain defendants from a judgment for plaintiff and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial; also appeal by plaintiff from part of a judgment dismissing as to certain defendants; also appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant Roder.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCum, Love, Yaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See post, p. 962.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kramb-v-fincher-nyappdiv-1950.