Kraiza v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of Hartland

3 A.3d 70, 298 Conn. 904, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 319
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 8, 2010·No. SC 18667·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 478 (AC 30836), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant properly denied the plaintiffs application to subdivide his property?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kraiza v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of Hartland, 3 A.3d 70, 298 Conn. 904, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 319 (Colo. 2010).

3 A.3d 70 (Kraiza v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of Hartland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kraiza v. Planning and Zoning Com'n
41 A.3d 258 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)