Krahe v. Electric Conservation Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Krahe v. Electric Conservation Co.

155 N.Y.S. 358

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 155 N.Y.S. 358 (Krahe v. Electric Conservation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krahe v. Electric Conservation Co., 155 N.Y.S. 358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

SHEARN, J.

The evidence to uphold the court’s finding that plaintiff -was the procuring cause of the contract, while unsatisfactory, might be sufficient to sustain the judgment, if there were any evidence upon which the amount of the commission could be predicated. The contract was not introduced in evidence, and the record discloses nothing but a statement made to the court by plaintiff’s attorney concerning the amount of the contract.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHEARN, J.

The evidence to uphold the court’s finding that plaintiff -was the procuring cause of the contract, while unsatisfactory, might be sufficient to sustain the judgment, if there were any evidence upon which the amount of the commission could be predicated. The contract was not introduced in evidence, and the record discloses nothing but a statement made to the court by plaintiff’s attorney concerning the amount of the contract.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 N.Y.S. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krahe-v-electric-conservation-co-nyappterm-1915.