Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Krah v. Radcliffe

Krah v. Radcliffe

81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 305, 8 Buchanan 305, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 296
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1911·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Sway,ze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krah v. Radcliffe, 81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 305, 8 Buchanan 305, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 296 (N.J. 1911).

81 A. 1133 (Krah v. Radcliffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.
272 A.2d 565 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Gottlaub v. Cohen
51 A.2d 254 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Bondarchuk v. Barber
38 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Buttinghausen v. Rappeport
24 A.2d 877 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Miller v. Headley
158 A. 118 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
Wheeler v. Sullivan
90 Fla. 711 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)