Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Krah v. Radcliffe

Krah v. Radcliffe

81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 305, 8 Buchanan 305, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 296
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 81 A. 1133 (Krah v. Radcliffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krah v. Radcliffe, 81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 305, 8 Buchanan 305, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 296 (N.J. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Sway,ze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.
272 A.2d 565 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Gottlaub v. Cohen
51 A.2d 254 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Bondarchuk v. Barber
38 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Buttinghausen v. Rappeport
24 A.2d 877 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Miller v. Headley
158 A. 118 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
Wheeler v. Sullivan
90 Fla. 711 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 305, 8 Buchanan 305, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krah-v-radcliffe-nj-1911.