Kraft v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

• Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
• Decided: January 7, 2020
• Docket: 1:19-cv-00323
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:19-cv-323

ROBERT L. KRAFT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER V. ) ) STATE FARM FIRE AND ) CASUALTY COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________ )

This matter is before the Court . On January 7, 2020, the undersigned held a conference call with counsel for the parties during which counsel were advised that the undersigned is a State Farm automobile and homeowner policyholder. The undersigned has in the past made and satisfactorily settled claims with State Farm but does not have any open claims with State Farm at this time. These circumstances do not appear to create any basis for concern about the Court’s ability to be impartial in this matter. See e.g., Robinson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 13 F.3d 160, 163 (5th Cir. 1994) (argument that judge should have recused himself because he was a State Farm policyholder “borders on the trivial”); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Hood, No. CIVA207CV188KSMTP, 2007 WL 4191976 (S.D. Miss. Oct. 10, 2007). Nonetheless, the Court wished to advise the parties of this information and to offer them an opportunity to voice any concerns they may have or provide any additional information they believe should be considered in this regard. Accordingly, the parties are directed to confer and to file, within 7 days of the entry of this Order, a notice of their positions or any other submissions regarding this issue they deem appropriate. It is so ordered.

Signed: January 7, 2020 Ca 4

W. Carleton Metcalf fe United States Magistrate Judge KATY