Kraft v. Maile

Connecticut Appellate Court

Kraft v. Maile

500 A.2d 1345, 5 Conn. App. 628, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1210

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedDecember 17, 1985

Docket4097

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 500 A.2d 1345 (Kraft v. Maile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kraft v. Maile, 500 A.2d 1345, 5 Conn. App. 628, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1210 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal by the defendant attacks a judgment rendered by the trial court on the ground [629]*629that the court found facts without evidence to support those facts. An appellate court may not retry facts and its duty upon review when such a claim is made is limited to a determination of whether the trial court’s judgment was clearly erroneous in this respect. A careful review of the record and briefs in this appeal leads to the conclusion that the trial court was not in error.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal by the defendant attacks a judgment rendered by the trial court on the ground [629]*629that the court found facts without evidence to support those facts. An appellate court may not retry facts and its duty upon review when such a claim is made is limited to a determination of whether the trial court’s judgment was clearly erroneous in this respect. A careful review of the record and briefs in this appeal leads to the conclusion that the trial court was not in error.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

500 A.2d 1345, 5 Conn. App. 628, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraft-v-maile-connappct-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack