Kraft v. Maile

500 A.2d 1345, 5 Conn. App. 628, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1210
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 17, 1985·No. 4097·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal by the defendant attacks a judgment rendered by the trial court on the ground [629] that the court found facts without evidence to support those facts. An appellate court may not retry facts and its duty upon review when such a claim is made is limited to a determination of whether the trial court’s judgment was clearly erroneous in this respect. A careful review of the record and briefs in this appeal leads to the conclusion that the trial court was not in error.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kraft v. Maile, 500 A.2d 1345, 5 Conn. App. 628, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1210 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

500 A.2d 1345 (Kraft v. Maile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kraft v. Maile
508 A.2d 31 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1986)