Kraft v. John A. Vassilaros & Sons, Inc.

43 A.D.2d 972, 352 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5706
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 19, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 43 A.D.2d 972 (Kraft v. John A. Vassilaros & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kraft v. John A. Vassilaros & Sons, Inc., 43 A.D.2d 972, 352 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., which was settled by stipulation upon the record, made during the course of trial, plaintiff’s attorney appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 1, 1973, which (1) denied her motion to compel defendant’s insurance carrier to pay the amount of the settlement, in accordance with the stipulation, by three separate checks payable respectively to' plaintiffs, a named lienor, and plaintiffs’ attorney, but (2) granted her leave to move to restore the case to the trial calendar. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. However, the operation of this determination is stayed until 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, to afford plaintiffs an opportunity to institute a plenary suit to set the settlement aside, if they be so advised; and, if such plenary suit be commenced and prosecuted with due diligence, this stay, that is, of the delivery of the cheeks, shall continue until the determination of such suit. Special Term’s memorandum decision stated in part that at the time of the settlement of the case the court and plaintiffs were not advised as to the amount of the debt due to the lienor and that therefore it' would be inequitable and unfair to plaintiffs to grant the motion. However, the settlement constituted a contract which could not be set aside without a plenary suit (Schweber v. Berger, 27 A D 2d 840; Finlayson v. KeUner Gar & Limousine Serv., 30 A D 2d 676; Dennison V. Malta, 35 Mise 2d 33). Shapiro, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Village of Greenwood Lake v. Mountain Lake Estates, Inc.
189 A.D.2d 987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Yoon Pil Kim v. Shull
90 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Raphael v. Booth Memorial Hospital
67 A.D.2d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Fuchs v. Fuchs
65 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Bernstein v. Salvatore
62 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Cerrato v. Midland Insurance
58 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Hallock v. State
58 A.D.2d 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Claim of Nelson v. Avon Products
50 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
A. & B. Service Station, Inc. v. State
50 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 A.D.2d 972, 352 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraft-v-john-a-vassilaros-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1974.